🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to employ a revised congressional map that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to lift a lower court's injunction that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and disrupting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps established after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its decision was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision occurs during a countrywide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican control. Usually, map-drawing happens after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create a number of additional conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

Conversely, opposition party leaders lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A top Democratic leader said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.