🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."